Incremental reading is an attention destroyer: Revision history

25 February 2013

• curprev 12:2812:28, 25 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,977 bytes +12 →Internet addiction

24 February 2013

• curprev 10:3410:34, 24 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,965 bytes +198 No edit summary

23 February 2013

• curprev 23:3423:34, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,767 bytes +549 →Incremental reading boots attention
• curprev 23:2923:29, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,218 bytes +1 →Internet addiction
• curprev 23:2723:27, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,217 bytes +2 →Answer
• curprev 23:2723:27, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,215 bytes +4 →Answer
• curprev 23:1423:14, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,211 bytes +1 →Learning vs. problem solving
• curprev 23:1323:13, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,210 bytes +119 →Overloading memory and the role of sleep
• curprev 23:0823:08, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,091 bytes +3 →Learning speed bottleneck
• curprev 23:0623:06, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 7,088 bytes +92 →Learning vs. problem solving
• curprev 23:0523:05, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 6,996 bytes +63 →Answer
• curprev 23:0523:05, 23 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 6,933 bytes +5,344 No edit summary

22 February 2013

• curprev 10:2610:26, 22 February 2013 SuperMemoHelp talk contribs 1,589 bytes +1,589 Created page with "= Problem = ''Tomek wrote:'' It is possible that article structure and quality do matter that much because the real bottleneck is the human brain (speed of cortex plasticity)? ..."